The AMD card is about 40 percent faster and costs 29 percent more, while the Nvidia card is 50 percent faster and costs 40 percent more. The bigger problem for the 1050 Ti isn't the RX 460, but rather the RX 470 4GB and GTX 1060 3GB, which are the next step up the pricing ladder. You pay more for more performance, but which is actually the better value? The 1050 Ti is around 25 percent faster overall and costs 17 percent more-maybe not a decisive victory, but enough to give it the win. The GTX 1050 Ti costs $140 or more, and the chief competition is AMD's RX 460 4GB which can be found for as little as $120.
Ti connect ce ac Pc#
What more, because nearly all the 1050 Ti models come sans power connector, you can use them in just about any PC made in the past five years.
Ti connect ce ac upgrade#
If you didn't upgrade to the 950 and 960 last year but you were eyeing the level of performance they provide-for esports or for less demanding gaming-the 1050 Ti is a great little card. That's not really giving the GP107 proper credit, though, because while it's not faster it's more efficient and costs less. Together, that makes the GTX 1050 Ti about 60 percent faster than the 750 Ti, a little more than two and a half years later. If you have something like a GTX 960 or R9 380, there's absolutely no reason to look at the 1050 Ti, but what about budget gamers running something older, like a 750 Ti? In that case, while I haven't collected numbers myself, AnandTech and other sites show the 950 outperforming the 750 Ti by around 35 percent on average, and by my numbers the 1050 Ti is around 20 percent faster than the 950. Remember the GTX 960 4GB from last year? It delivers virtually identical performance to the GTX 1050 Ti-yes, while using more power, but otherwise they're the same level of performance. Looking at some older cards, things get a bit messier. Even in normally AMD-centric games like Ashes and Doom, the 1050 Ti holds a 25-30 percent lead over the RX 460 4GB.
Ti connect ce ac 1080p#
Elsewhere, Nvidia's advantage can be huge, like the 40-50 percent lead in Civ6, 35-40 percent in Fallout 4, and as much as 70 percent in GTA5 (not that either card really handles 1080p ultra very well there). It's not even a close matchup, really-RX 460's best games in our suite are Hitman and Deus Ex, where the 1050 Ti is still around 10 percent faster in most cases, though the 460 does pull off a tie in DXMD at 1080p medium. The GTX 1050 Ti stakes a claim to the fastest $140-ish budget GPU on the market, easily beating the RX 460 4GB-though that card does cost a bit less. I've included those cards, as well as some older GPUs and some cards that are a step up for comparison.Ĭycle through the above images to see the individual gaming benchmarks. The primary competition for the 1050 Ti is a bit nebulous, as the RX 460 4GB costs $20 less while the RX 470 4GB costs $30 more, leaving the 1050 Ti stuck in the middle. I've spot-checked performance with a simulated i3-4360 (dual-core, 3.7GHz) and found most games are completely GPU limited with the GTX 1050 Ti and 1050. I'm using a decidedly non-budget test system, with an overclocked Core i7-5930K, but in most of the games that's not a major factor. I'm skipping 4K testing entirely, as that's obviously not the target of budget offerings. Since the GTX 1050 Ti is a budget card, I'm limiting testing to 1080p at medium and ultra quality, with 1440p ultra results showing whether there's room for the card to reach higher in some games. Of the games tested, only Ashes of the Singularity, Hitman, and Gears of War 4 are tested in DX12 mode on all cards-Gears of course being DX12-exclusive, and the other two because they generally run better in DX12 mode.
All of the cards are tested on their 'best' API, which means unless there's a specific reason to prefer Vulkan or DX12 over OpenGL or DX11, most games run best with DX11/OpenGL on the 1050 Ti. I've revamped our gaming test suite to include a bunch of newer releases, and I've ditched some older games, making the benchmarks more relevant.
0 kommentar(er)
